Sunday, September 21, 2014

How to Use Mistakes to Rebuild Yourself

    

        
                                                                        Photo Credit:  www. publicdomainpictures.net             


    Utilizing Mistakes to Make them Go Away

    Everyone makes mistakes.  Not everyone responds to them effectively, however.  Successful people mine mistakes for useful information.  Unsuccessful people despair at them.  

    Which strategy you take depends largely upon what you think about ability.  If you are willing to accept that you (and by extension all of your skills) are a work in progress, then it becomes easier to view mistakes as actionable feedback.  From this perspective, If I am tennis player who starts to consistently hits serves into the net, I can hypothesize that I am dropping my head too quickly.  If I correct the mechanical flaw, then my serves will start going in.

    If, however, I think that my abilities are more or less fixed, then mistakes convey no information other than a revelation of my own terminal ineptitude.  When my serves start going into the net, I have no choice but to think that I am a terrible server, which will assure that I continue to double fault.

    The point isn’t to intentionally make a lot of mistakes.  The point is to recognize that mistakes are inevitable, analyze them for data, and use that data for self-correction.  If you are able to pinpoint the reasons why you make particular mistakes, you will be able to eliminate them.

    This is the most effective technique for self-improvement I have come across, but it necessitates that one be willing to admit fallibility.  It can be frustrating when people refuse to acknowledge their mistakes, but you can rest easy if that person is a competitor; their obstinacy almost guarantees that they will have a hard time improving.

    Teasing Out Imperfections: What Tests are Good For  

    Few people have a positive impression of tests, but that’s because the way we use them is hard to love.  Most often we use tests as final evaluations. They tell you how good you are at something, and a positive outcome is contingent upon a passing score.  This understandably makes them stressful.  

    If tests are used as provisional evaluations, however, we can approach them very differently.  The authors of Make It Stick suggest we utilize tests in just such a fashion.  In their view, tests are the most effective way to ferret out what one does not know.  There is no way to fix a problem that you don’t know you have.  Well-designed, frequently administered tests are the best way to get an accurate evaluation of the state of one’s knowledge.

    You can easily incorporate informal testing into your everyday life.  You don’t need to sit down and write exams.  All you have to do is continually ask yourself, “Did I get that?”  Resist the urge to say, “I know,” because frequently you actually do not (at least I don’t).  When you read a book, continually stop and ask, “What did I just read?”  If you can’t answer that question, then you do not know.  Go back and read it until you do. 

  Obviously this requires a level of effort that is impossible to sustain at all times (at least for me).  But I suggest you pull it out of your toolbox when you really want to learn something.  There are no shortcuts.  Effective learning is hard work.  But it’s worth it when you see the results.      

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

From the Cutting Room Floor

            In the process of writing this book, I feel like I have deleted almost as many words as I have written.  I deleted some of them because they were bad, but I deleted others simply because they didn't fit.  Here is an example of something that didn't make the cut not because it was terrible, but because there was no place for it in the book.

            Hong Kong - Of Money Markets and Street Vendors
          
            Allow me to draw a back of the envelope distinction: Hong Kong is a coin with two faces.  The image of a bank is stamped on one side, the likeness of a pushcart scratched on the other.  If you stand on the wharf at Kowloon Bay and look out at the incandescent bar graph that is the city skyline, all you see is money.  White light coruscates off the glass trunks of skyscrapers by day, and runs down them in LED rainbows by night.  Yachts are moored at the quays, yachts circle the bay, yachts return from a day at sea back-lit by the setting sun.  “I feel like I’m in Vancouver,” Todd said as we walked past designer boutiques, through glass-enclosed sky bridges, and into a Starbucks.  One side of the bay is what the architectural avatar of wealth looks like.

            But there is another side of the bay.  Our hotel was located there.  Buildings were smaller.  Buildings were shabbier.  Buildings were held up by bamboo scaffolding that I was afraid to walk under - and not because I’m superstitious.  I’m going to betray one of my prejudices when I say this, but that side of the bay is what I imagined South East Asia would look like.  It's also what I thought it would smell like.  It’s some combination of sweat, soy sauce, unknown herbs, and roasting pork.  It’s a pleasant smell.  This is excessive romanticizing on my part, but it smells like hard work.  It smells like people of less than ample means making the most of what they’ve got.  It smells better to me than the metallic pheromones of money the skyscrapers secrete on the other side of the bay.

            I don’t want to wax lyrical on the dignities of poverty.  Poverty is not uplifting and we more fortunate should not keep people trapped in it by crowning them with the dubious laurels of the noble poor.  There is nothing desirable about a life of poverty, and giving people the tools to lift themselves from it should be a main societal goal. 

         (I don't know why but I can't change the formatting of the next paragraph.  The difference in font is just a glitch).
   

         But there is virtue in a life spent in the pursuit of something other than the trappings of wealth.  You don’t need a shiny car to be worth something.  You don’t need an expensive suit, or a flashy watch, or an alligator-skin briefcase to be happy.  I would suggest that those kinds of accessories are more of an impediment to happiness than a source.  Too many of us carry them around (or pursue them) without realizing that they can easily become glittery sets of shackles.  Poverty is not dignified (though many people do handle it with dignity), and neither is wealth necessarily a ticket to paradise.  I, for one, would like just enough wealth to be my own master, but not so much that I become its slave.





 Money.




 Still a lot of money.  But as good as I could do from my photo stock.

   

        A little sanctimonious perhaps, but then again I also cut it.  More from Make It Stick on Saturday.

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

How To Learn Better: Transmissions From the Realm of Cognitive Science

It took me over a decade of seriously studying Japanese before I was comfortable calling myself fluent.  Part of the reason it took so long is that Japanese is hard.  The rest of the reason is that I had never read this book:

                                          

This is an amazing book.  I think that anyone who is interested in learning anything should read it, which basically means that I think everyone should read it.  Learning should be meaningful.  Life is still short, which means that time is still precious, which means that nobody wants to waste it doing boring or painful things.  A waste of time is perhaps the worst kind of waste there is.  This is my main operating principle as both a student and an educator.  But what kind of learning is meaningful?

Learning that sticks.  What kind is meaningless?  The kind that is evacuated from memory as soon as you have been tested on it.  I don’t think you can even call that learning.  That kind of learning is like a Snapchat; you can only look at it for like ten seconds before it disappears.

I don’t know about you but I don’t want to waste time sending myself mental Snapchats.  When I lay down a memory, I want it to remain available for a while.

But how do you lay down a memory?  The authors of Make It Stick suggest that most of us have been doing it all wrong.  Are your textbooks streaked with highlighter?  Do you spend time reading and rereading the same passages of text over and over again?  Do you take notes in class or meetings, or download Power Point presentations and laboriously commit them to memory?  Do you repeat phrases in your head a hundred times until you’ve got them memorized, and never think about them again?  If you do, then chances are good you aren’t remembering nearly as much as you feel like you should.

Why?  Most of the above study habits end up doing one thing and one thing only: loading material into short term memory.  You may come out the other side of a study sessions able to fluently recite a passage or rattle off a string of vocabulary words, but you will run into (at least) two problems: 1) you might trick yourself into thinking you understand the material better than you actually do, and 2) if you don’t keep reviewing you will soon forget it all anyway.

The Fluency Illusion

The authors of Make It Stick point out something called the Fluency Illusion.  Once I learned about the Fluency Illusion, I realized I had been falling for it my entire life.  The Fluency Illusion boils down to this pithy phrase (which is not mine): fluency with the material does not necessarily indicate mastery of the content.  Just because you can recite something from memory does not mean you know what you are talking about.

    This realization was revelatory for me.  I don’t know how much time I wasted trying to accurately represent a given author’s phraseology in my mind when I didn’t actually understand what he or she was trying to say.  There are no magic words, merely more or less expressive ones.  Make It Stick taught me to stop worrying about memorizing other people’s words, and to start worrying about getting through them to what they were trying to say.

Incessant Forgetting

Everybody forgets.  Forgetting is (at the moment) a neurobiological inevitability.  Sometimes it is good.  You have to forget some things (what you ate for lunch yesterday, for example) to live a normal life.  Many times it is bad.  Forgetting is bad when you find yourself forgetting things you have spent hours slaving to learn.

How can we combat this kind of unwanted forgetting?  There are ways.  There are techniques to beat forgetting, and if you buy Make It Stick you can learn them.  Or, if you don’t read books (you should read books), then you can just keep an eye on this blog.  I will have some tips for you in the upcoming days.

Sunday, September 7, 2014

What You're Missing if You Don't Have a Kindle

    When they first came out I was pretty down on e-readers.  Like technophobes everywhere, I was convinced that the aesthetics of a traditional book were a critical part of the reading experience.  The heft of the book, the feel of the paper on your fingertips, the swish of the pages when you turn them, the smell of ink and pulp and the printing press.  You can't recreate that on an electronic device!  I thought.  I'll never get one.

    Well, I got one, and the only bound books I read these days are new releases I feel very strongly about.  There are a number of different e-readers, but I have a Kindle.  The Kindle is light so I can take it anywhere; it's flat so I don't have to hold it open; the screen doesn't cut me; it has a built in dictionary; it includes clickable menus to quickly navigate through the text; books are delivered immediately over the internet; it recommends titles for further reading.  I've always read a lot, but my book consumption has exploded since I got a Kindle, mostly because it makes getting and reading books incredibly easy.

  


I couldn't do this with a traditional book.  

    It also makes publishing books incredibly easy.  All you need is a manuscript and the ability to click boxes and fill in fields.  The Amazon software and web architecture does the rest.  I've been incredibly impressed by the Kindle Direct Publishing service and would highly recommend it to anyone with a book who doesn't want to belly up to the roulette table that is traditional publishing.

    But let's get back to the Kindle itself.  There are a number of models ranging from grayscale e-readers to the full color Kindle Fire.  I personally use the Kindle Paperwhite, which rules.  It doesn't support color, but it's backlit, has a touch-activated dictionary (touch and hold the word you want defined and as long as you aren't reading highly experimental fiction it will show you the definition), and a battery that lasts for days.  It's also not that expensive: you can get it for - actually I just checked and the new ones are more expensive than I thought.  About $180.

    You can get an older model for cheaper, or you could just get the app for free.  You can use the app on your computer (PC or Mac), phone (Android or iPhone), tablet (iPad or whatever else there is).  It's color supported, and while not quite as easy on the eyes as the Kindles themselves, still makes for a pleasant reading experience.  You'l need either a Kindle or a Kindle App to read my book, but even if you don't decide to read my book I would recommend getting one anyway.  It's the easiest way to get on the reading rainbow, and once you're on I bet you won't want to get off.

    Oh, by the way my book is now available for pre-order.  Get it today!